Financial News     SFIA Ltd School Fees Advisers
Home
About Us
Financial News
Latest Articles
Annuities
Asset Allocation
Corporate
Current Issues
Economic Issues
Independent Education
ISAs
Investments
Market Overview
Property
Protection
Retirement
Tax
Trusts
With Profits
----------------------------
Financial News Archive
Our Details
contact Us

Search

SFIA Group
School Fees Planning School Fees Planning
Independent School Search Independent School Search
Mortgage Services Mortgage Services
Tax Planning Tax Planning
Wills and Estate Planning Wills and State Planning
Client Services Client Services
Financial Information Service Financial Information Service

Private care homes

Equal protection from human rights laws


Elderly patients placed by the Government in private care homes should receive the same protection from human rights laws as they would in public facilities, the House of Lords heard recently.

In a case that could affect up to 300,000 people in private care, the law lords will be asked to decide whether a private care home should be considered a public entity in the case of an 84-year-old Alzheimer’s sufferer, identified only as YL.

Under UK law, the provisions of the Human Rights Act apply to public bodies but not to private companies. Representation for YL, told the panel of five law lords that the Act should apply in this case because YL’s placement had been funded by Birmingham City Council.

The home, run by Southern Cross Healthcare, attempted to evict YL after accusing her husband and daughter of disturbing behaviour, including breaking a light fitting and being aggressive to staff.

Her case was taken up by the Official Solicitor - the officer called upon to represent people unable to represent themselves - who claimed an eviction would be a violation of her human rights.

In January, the Court of Appeal rejected similar arguments that a private care home is exercising a public function when it looks after people referred to it and funded by the local authority. They said they must follow previous rulings that a private care home could not be classified as a public body.

But they agreed the woman’s case should be referred to the highest court in the land because of its public importance. Her appeal has been backed by Lord Falconer of Thoroton, the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs.

The case has been supported by groups such as the Disability Rights Commission, British Institute of Human Rights, Liberty; Help the Aged and Age Concern.

Liberty's legal officer, said: “To deny an elderly person her rights merely because her care has been contracted out by the Government to a private company is desperately unfair. Human rights are specifically intended to protect the most basic rights of vulnerable people but the current position undermines this safeguard.”

If you require any further information about the services that we provide or would like to review your financial planning position, please contact us

Back to Articles